.
Feedback

School Official: 'It's Ludicrous for Anyone to Have an Assault Rifle'

Henry Castaniada said he struggles with the idea of guns in schools.

Following last week's NRA press conference in which lobbyist Wayne LaPierre called for armed guards in every school, Patch reached out to Soquel Union Elementary School District Superintendent Henry Castaniada for his thoughts on the guns in local schools.

Castaniada on gun laws:

Nobody should have an assault rifle. It's politics and power and a loss of perception of what we've become. As superintendent I worry about safety. But when people start talking about assault rifles as a right, I struggle with this.

Laws have been written in a way that people can find loopholes. ... I don't mind people who hunt or skeet shoot. But when you give people military weapons for no purpose other than doing carnage like what happened in Connecticut, what is your value system? 

We have irrational people who want to shoot 300 rounds. What do you need that gun for? They say it's the Second Amendment. When was the Second Amendment written? Did that have any connection to the technology today? Absolutely not. It's ludicrous for anyone to have an assault rifle. Then they say we should arm everybody. You want children to be safe and you want to arm everyone? This is the rationality that we're dealing with. 

Castaniada on the goal of public education:

"We're educators. Our job every day is to the bring out the very best in our children. It's in nurturing, being inclusive, and making an environment for our students' hope. That's our mission. When you have the NRA saying this is what schools should do, I look at that statement and say 'Whose mission are you talking about?' I struggle with their message. Their message has nothing to do with why people go into public education." 

Castaniada on protecting students:

Parents have a right to believe that when they send their children to school, those children are safe. What I'm struggling with is having the National Rifle Association saying 'We want to change your mission. We believe in our perspective because this is our mission.' I'm struggling with this. We're raising children. We're embracing what parents give their children. We're nurturing calmness. And then someone says 'If you have an armed guard at your school every day, there's a parity to violence.'

If we don't build environments where we build a healthy conscience and where we can reach out and be nurturing, what world do we become? We become a penal system. That's not public education.

Do you agree with Castaniada's stance on guns in schools? Disagree? Does he make you feel like your kids are safe at school? Tell us in the comments!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Capitola-Soquel Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jane December 28, 2012 at 10:02 pm
So very well said, Mr.Castaniada! As a mother of two young children, I am outraged that anyone thinks putting weapons in our schools is a good idea. I am thankful to have Mr. Castaniada in our school system.
Frank Geefay December 30, 2012 at 04:46 pm
I totally agree with Superintendent Castaniada's sentiments.
Wayne Day January 1, 2013 at 12:01 pm
Castaniada is merely regurgitating talking points from the LAST time they tried to ban assault weapons. "Who needs them," "The Second Amendment was written 200 years ago," "They're only for killing," it's really disingenuous, faulty thinking.
The thought of guns in school is horrible until there's trouble, then they call people with guns and hope they get there in time.
Jacob Bourne (Editor) January 2, 2013 at 04:22 pm
Wayne, can you explain why Castaniada's points on the Second Amendment and assault rifles only being for killing are "disingenuous, faulty thinking"?
Frank Geefay January 3, 2013 at 04:31 pm
Disingenuous means insincere. Does Superintendent Castaniada sound like a dispassionate person who does not care about the safety of his students or the practicality of owning assault weapons?
If you believe in assault weapons then would you also agree that you should have the right to own a modern 3000 bullets/min Gatling gun, grenade launcher, or Stinger missile? After all aren't these also Arms. Why not a Bradley M1 Abrams Tank if you could afford one? How about an atomic bomb? Are there any weapons that would be excluded by the 2nd Amendment and if so what and why? What faultless thinking do you have for making such claims?
patty January 11, 2013 at 01:58 pm
As a parent and a school employee, Superintendent Castaniada's comments could not be more true. While our students safety is always first and foremost, turning the school campuses into a "military compound" will in no way enforce the safe nurturing environment needed to educate our children. The events that have occurred in recent months have been due to unstable individuals that had access to firearms that should never be on the streets. Once again- we need to address why these people with obviously deep mental problems have not been dealt with long before such atrocities occur, and why they had access to weapons that only law enforcement or military personnel should have.
And yes Mr. day, we will call the people, assuming you mean the Police, that have the assault weapons because they're the ONLY ones that should have them. Bravo Superintendent Castaniada!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Cheri O'Neil June 5, 2013 at 05:42 pm
I use the Nike Running app to time my run and listen to stories on "This American Life" onRead More NPR.
towseesq May 30, 2013 at 08:41 am
The Soquel Cemetery looked wonderful with all of the flags flying for Memorial Day. Thank you toRead More all of the folks who did this!
Soquel Deb June 7, 2013 at 08:11 am
On my own, I did a much smaller version at the Santa Cruz cemetery by Dominican - planted flags forRead More a few 'doughboys' from WWI and Navy and Army guys from WWII. My dad was a career Naval aviator and flew reconaissance in the Vietnam conflict. Next year, I'll join you in the Soquel cemetery, what a great idea to do this as a community effort!
Dan Young April 16, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Hi, Nigel - I agree with you that there needs to be more understanding between everyone. I grew upRead More boating (lake and ocean) in this area and was taught the 'rules of the road'. As long as everyone abides by the rules and keeps each other safe, I don't care what one rides. I agree that the announcer should have been more aware not only with expressing his personal views but he should have had the experience to see that you needed to take a certain path and were not there trying to catch waves. Ignorance on his part. I kneeboard and body surf (yes, I can stand-up surf, also) and have had my share of run-ins over the years. I don't surf the major breaks anymore unless its really big, which thins out all but the most skilled. These days I try and find a little break away from the crowds (not an easy task) and am happy with a few little peelers here and there.
AdrianaR April 17, 2013 at 04:04 am
Is it me or does there seem to be an excessive amount of us vs them mentality and worse, anger inRead More Santa Cruz these days? I went to a community event not too long ago and it was clearly present amongst a number of the people there, they definitely had a "this is our town not yours" vibe going on. It reminded me of the old Valley go home mentality that rears its head sometimes. I know your post was about sharing the ocean but in a more general sense that easy going chill attitude I love about Santa Cruz seems to be getting lost in too much anger and quite frankly a "Me-ism" and egocenteredness that's a big turnoff.
Steve Westside April 17, 2013 at 05:11 pm
During the SUP/Kayak contest a few weeks ago there were a group of us below the end of the contestRead More event area and after we all (Stand-up and prone paddlers) went to far into the area the organizers just pointed out that we need to stay below the judges booth. After a bit we of course all drifted further up and then someone on land announced that it is a misdemeanor to interfere with a contest. Finally, they sent a guy out to mind us and let us know to not drift above him. All very pleasant and cordial. Except for a few surfers thought the rules did not apply to them and constantly snaked in and paddled up to grab waves. Made everyone our there grabbing a few leftover waves looking like prima donnas. Eventually those incorrigibles left and after the contest ended it was a great afternoon of surfing for everyone.
Beverly Young April 4, 2013 at 12:54 pm
A big fat 0!!!!! I couldn't stand the Rolling Stones in the 60's and I really can't stand them now.Read More They should have retired a very long time ago.
Cathy P. April 4, 2013 at 05:54 pm
When I was a teenager you were either a Beatles fan or a Stones fan, you couldn't be both ;) Let'sRead More just say I didn't become a Stones fan until my later years. That being said, I wouldn't pay any amount to see them in concert: too loud, drunk & drugged audience, and the lines are too long to the bathroom! I am glad to see they are still around even though they all are on Medicare now - rofl.
Sabrina Wilhelm April 4, 2013 at 11:47 pm
I would pay a big fat zero...