.
Feedback

Check ‘N Go To Pay Out $4.3 Million to California Residents

San Francisco City Attorney is spearheading statewide effort to notify customers who have until March 28, 2012 to file a claim.

California residents who paid exorbitant interest rates for online

installation loans may be eligible for repayment over the next three months
in a refund drive announced Thursday by San Francisco City Attorney Dennis
Herrera.

Consumers who dealt with Cincinnati-based Check 'n Go are eligible
for restitution under a June settlement with Herrera's office in which the

payday loan company agreed to pay $4.3 million in refunds.

Herrera said Check 'n Go partnered with an out-of-state bank in an
illicit scheme to skirt California's maximum interest rate of 36 percent for
the payday loans and made loans with interest rates as high as 400 percent.

Herrera said there are thousands of victims statewide, many who
are "the working poor, who are living paycheck to paycheck."

Because of the exorbitant rates, "people could never get their
principal paid down ... and the number continued to grow," he said.

The nearest Check ‘N Go is located in Watsonville at 1441 Main Street where California Check Cashing used to be located.

The city attorney's office is coordinating a statewide outreach
effort to notify customers who are eligible for refunds, which must be
claimed during a three-month period between today and March 28.

Herrera said San Francisco has one of California's highest density
of payday loan companies and that he will be traveling to other hot spots
around the state, including Los Angeles and the Central Valley.

A refund drive earlier this year for a similar settlement with the
payday lender Money Mart/Loan Mart netted more than 8,100 claimants who
received an average of nearly $700.

As part of that outreach, Herrera's office created a video with
the popular song "Call Me Maybe" to encourage claimants to come forward, and
he did not rule out similar efforts in this case.

"However we need to get the word out, we're going to do it,"
Herrera said.

"That was very successful in what it was intended to do," he said,
noting his office received a spike in claimants after the video's release.

Check 'n Go claimants may qualify for restitution if they received
an online four-month installation loan between November 2006 and June 2008
through the websites www.checkngo.comwww.ilp.fbdel.com or
www.commandloans.com.

The refunds will range from $20 to $4,675, depending on the size
of the payment by the claimant.

People are encouraged to visit www.caloanrefund.org, email
caloanrefund@sfgov.org or call toll-free to (855) 581-2350 for more
information about how to make a claim.

Copyright © 2012 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse
without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Do you subscribe to the Capitola-Soquel Patch newsletter? It brings our latest stories, blogs, announcements and the day's calendar events to your in-box early each morning. Follow Capitola-Soquel Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Do you have opinions, experiences and views to share? Consider becoming a Capitola-Soquel Patch blogger!.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Capitola-Soquel Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jennifer Squires May 23, 2013 at 02:04 pm
Is that where they're digging up the sewer lines? They've had it down to one lane a lot lately, thenRead More cover the holes with steel plates when they're not working (more traffic slow downs as people try to navigate the hazards).
Jane May 23, 2013 at 07:55 am
Southbound on Soquel before Park Avenue.
Steve Westside April 17, 2013 at 05:11 pm
During the SUP/Kayak contest a few weeks ago there were a group of us below the end of the contestRead More event area and after we all (Stand-up and prone paddlers) went to far into the area the organizers just pointed out that we need to stay below the judges booth. After a bit we of course all drifted further up and then someone on land announced that it is a misdemeanor to interfere with a contest. Finally, they sent a guy out to mind us and let us know to not drift above him. All very pleasant and cordial. Except for a few surfers thought the rules did not apply to them and constantly snaked in and paddled up to grab waves. Made everyone our there grabbing a few leftover waves looking like prima donnas. Eventually those incorrigibles left and after the contest ended it was a great afternoon of surfing for everyone.
AdrianaR April 17, 2013 at 04:04 am
Is it me or does there seem to be an excessive amount of us vs them mentality and worse, anger inRead More Santa Cruz these days? I went to a community event not too long ago and it was clearly present amongst a number of the people there, they definitely had a "this is our town not yours" vibe going on. It reminded me of the old Valley go home mentality that rears its head sometimes. I know your post was about sharing the ocean but in a more general sense that easy going chill attitude I love about Santa Cruz seems to be getting lost in too much anger and quite frankly a "Me-ism" and egocenteredness that's a big turnoff.
Dan Young April 16, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Hi, Nigel - I agree with you that there needs to be more understanding between everyone. I grew upRead More boating (lake and ocean) in this area and was taught the 'rules of the road'. As long as everyone abides by the rules and keeps each other safe, I don't care what one rides. I agree that the announcer should have been more aware not only with expressing his personal views but he should have had the experience to see that you needed to take a certain path and were not there trying to catch waves. Ignorance on his part. I kneeboard and body surf (yes, I can stand-up surf, also) and have had my share of run-ins over the years. I don't surf the major breaks anymore unless its really big, which thins out all but the most skilled. These days I try and find a little break away from the crowds (not an easy task) and am happy with a few little peelers here and there.
Sabrina Wilhelm April 4, 2013 at 11:47 pm
I would pay a big fat zero...
Cathy P. April 4, 2013 at 05:54 pm
When I was a teenager you were either a Beatles fan or a Stones fan, you couldn't be both ;) Let'sRead More just say I didn't become a Stones fan until my later years. That being said, I wouldn't pay any amount to see them in concert: too loud, drunk & drugged audience, and the lines are too long to the bathroom! I am glad to see they are still around even though they all are on Medicare now - rofl.
Beverly Young April 4, 2013 at 12:54 pm
A big fat 0!!!!! I couldn't stand the Rolling Stones in the 60's and I really can't stand them now.Read More They should have retired a very long time ago.
Jane March 1, 2013 at 08:42 pm
Dear Patch and Sentinel, Please start using this creep's mugshots. Shouldn't be hard to find one.Read More The smiling photos are just too much.
J Roland March 1, 2013 at 04:05 pm
Unbelievable!! The Army just let him loose on the general public without a backward glance. SoundsRead More like they had him cold on the two rapes and didn't want the hassle or bad press the prosecution would have given the Army! Well what kind of press is the Army getting now!! Tragic, really tragic that so many others were victimized by this monster when they didn't have to be! Is this really the kind of society we have become?!?!? Wake up people, it could happen to you or your loved ones!!
margaret Anderson March 1, 2013 at 05:21 am
What are the odds these two officers would be alive today had it not been for the dishonorable wayRead More the Army handled the rape allegations. Not to mention how those women felt when justice was not served. Nice going Army!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You set a fine example.